like the financial crisis, when investors shun riskier assets) nor risk-on (a period like
the post-crisis period, which we define from March 2009 through November 2014,
when investors embrace riskier assets). In a post-post-crisis landscape, markets have
a mixed outlook, in which growth is uneven and interest rates remain low. Although
a lot has changed in politics with an incoming Republican president and Republicanmajority
Congress, we believe that the post-post-crisis framework remains relevant.
In this piece, we will analyze the catalysts for the yields moving higher recently
and provide information on why we continue to believe that bonds are a sound
investment.
The Taper Tantrum vs. the Recent Rise in Yields
In 2013, the “Taper Tantrum” occurred when the market learned that the US Federal
Reserve planned to wind down its quantitative easing program — signaling the end
of monetary policy easing and the beginning of a shift toward monetary policy
tightening. Consequently, Treasury yields rose 100 basis points over two months.
The move higher in yields seemed like a reasonable reaction to such signaling.
The recent move in interest rates also makes sense. The market is taking several
things into consideration:
1. Uncertainty about the leadership of the Fed. Janet Yellen’s term as chair is due to
end in February 2018. Given the Fed’s dovish policy during her tenure, the market
is fearful that Trump will appoint a more hawkish leader who is more eager to raise
interest rates and reset the tone.
2. Looser fiscal policy. Trump has championed both lower taxes and higher
infrastructure spending. These policies, if implemented, would likely boost gross
domestic product and increase the federal budget deficit.
3. Higher inflation prospects. Looser fiscal policy should be a tailwind for inflation.
In addition, any protectionist policies, such as amending the North American Free
Trade Agreement or implementing tariffs, could cause prices to move higher.
Bond Fundamentals Moving Forward
On one hand, lower taxes, fiscal stimulus and deregulation are all positive factors for
riskier assets like stocks (and by extension negative for safer assets like Treasuries).
But there are still many uncertainties and other factors that provide reasons to be
constructive on fixed income:
1. Uncertain geopolitical backdrop. China is currently growing at a reasonably
healthy pace, but that has been aided by a rapid expansion in credit.
2. Uncertain U.S. government policy. To paraphrase Aristotle, the market abhors a
vacuum. Following the election, many aspects of government policy are in flux,
from spending plans to foreign relations.
3. Risk that fiscal stimulus plans miss their target. The nonpartisan Tax Policy
Center’s analysis of Trump’s income tax plan finds that, while high-income
taxpayers would enjoy most of his proposed tax savings, middle-income families
would receive an average tax cut of $1,000.
4. Risk of a trade war harming growth. If Trump were to follow through on his
proposals to increase tariffs on foreign goods, his actions could spiral into a trade
war. This would be negative for U.S. GDP growth.
5. Risk of restrictions on immigration hurting economic growth. One little-known
fact is that the growth in GDP per capita has trailed total GDP growth by 40%
since the financial crisis.
6. Risk of a shock hitting the economy. External shocks are, by nature, difficult to
predict but can have wide-ranging effects.
7. Large number of buyers of U.S. government debt. U.S. and foreign pension funds
and insurers use Treasuries as an important component of their portfolios, and this
shows no sign of changing.
What This Means for Investors
Although it seems very likely to us that the Fed will raise rates gradually in years to
come, expected risk-adjusted returns for investing in bonds remain appealing.
Recent volatility in the municipal bond market is beginning to present more
opportunities for munis*, while healthier realized inflation makes us continue to be
supportive of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities.
